The New 'Whitman Mission'

Dramatic new entrance for a revamped Keller Audiorium

We’ve seen recent examples of how a single, smart, motivated individual can change the course of public policy.  Think of William J. Hawkins III and restoration of the Elk Fountain, and Aubrey Russell and placement of the Abe Lincoln statue.

Next up: Karen Whitman and her concerted effort to improve the existing Keller Auditorium instead of building a more expensive new auditorium on the Portland State University campus.

 Whitman lost her first attempt, in an 8-4 decision by the City Council favoring the PSU site, when the majority preferred a large auditorium at PSU and a smaller one at the Keller site.  But four members who voted for PSU also said they wanted financial details for the two projects confirmed by Dec. 1.

 And here’s is why Whitman likely will eventually prevail: Neither the city of Portland nor PSU has the money in hand to build either proposed venue.  Renovating the Keller Auditorium into a 3,000-seat performance venue is a much less expensive option that also offers a better location for traffic, parking and lodging for visitors.  Preliminary plans for the New Keller have already been prepared – another potential savings.

 As the coming weeks unfold, Whitman is using her estimable skills in public relations, civic involvement, public administration and business relations to muster political support for the “new Keller.”  Drawings show a dramatic new entrance for the Keller as it faces the monumental Keller Fountain across Southwest Third Avenue.  Among her many credentials, Whitman is executive director the Halprin Landscape Conservancy, a non-profit devoted to preserving and protecting the series of fountains (including the Keller) that were designed by the office of landscape architect Lawrence Halprin in the urban renewal era of the late 1960s and early 1970s.

 Whitman is well-known in Portland’s artistic, business, and public management circles.  She became a well-known graphic artist early in her career, and led downtown Portland’s Artquake celebration for 15 years before becoming as director of Pioneer Courthouse Square. She also helped the formative years of the Oregon Sports Authority and the Portland Business Alliance, two non-profits aimed at encouraging the local economy.

 PSU, meanwhile, is suffering from budget losses and declining enrollment.  Rather than focus on its primary mission of higher education, its leadership seems ill-equipped to cope.  If PSU’s management can’t successfully run a university, why should it be entrusted with the region’s primary entertainment auditorium?

 As this scenario unfolds, Whitman is meeting with public and private groups to muster support for the updated Keller proposal.  She has a website with details at savethekeller.com. Interested people can sign up for her emails at info@halprinconservancy.org

 ---Fred Leeson

No AI is used in creating this blog.  You can join Building on History’s email list by writing “add me” to faroverpar463@gmail.com

 

 

  

Brian Libby's Labor of Love

 

No matter how long you’ve lived in Portland, Brian Libby’s collection of recommended central city walking tours likely will tell you many things you never knew about the Rose City.

“In Search of Portland, Exploring a Transforming City,” is unlike any tour guide you’ve run across.  It’s partly devoted to architecture, heavily devoted to interesting historical facts unrelated to buildings’ designs, and sprinkled with Libby’s memorabilia influenced by more than 20 years of writing about Portland’s architecture, arts and music an independent journalist.

A sample of snippets to enjoy: An obscure building on SW 13^th Avenue where The Kingsmen recorded “Louie, Louie,” the famous rock song recorded with such a poor microphone, the FBI tried to see if the song was pornographic; a music venue where Chuck Berry refused to perform until his $30,000 fee was paid in advance – in cash; the fact that the bouncy dance floor at the Crystal Ballroom wasn’t designed more than a century ago to thrill dancers, but to deter vibrations from streetcars and traffic passing by.

 The book is divided into six “walks,” not chapters, with maps designed for pedestrians.  Taking the book along on the walks would be a good idea for serious readers, because the book does not contain photographs of all locations discussed.

  Libby’s sprightly writing suggests that the book could have been put together quickly.  In fact, he worked on it for eight years and cites more than 60 articles for comments and quotations from articles he wrote earlier.  Along the way, he discusses prominent architects from A.E. Doyle and Pietro Belluschi to more modern designers who have left important stamps on urban Portland in the 21^st Century.

 In short, “In Search of Portland” will be a pleasant and informative read for anyone who claims to like Portland as well as Libby does.  That said, the volume has one shortcoming:  no index. Should a reader want to find a significant anecdote for any reason after putting the book down, scanning though lots of pages is the only solution.  Given all the places and people mentioned, an index would be a hefty addition.  But it should be considered if this worthy work survives into a second edition.

 ----Fred Leeson

 No AI is used in the production of this blog.  You can join Building on History’s email list by writing “add me” to faroverpar463@gmail.com