Wednesday, February 12, 2025

Any Chance of Saving Them?


Montgomery Hall


Blackstone

Sadly, the absence of any official landmark status means that two residential buildings that Portland State University plans to tear down will not have any public hearing as to whether they could be saved and refurbished, instead.

 Regardless, at least a few people who care about the PSU campus and its physical role in downtown Portland’s urban fabric have registered complaints.  Odds of the two buildings’ survival is slim, indeed.

News of the planned demolitions inspired Chet Orloff, a former executive director of the Oregon Historical Society among many other civic “hats,” to send his concerns to PSU’s president, Ann E. Cudd.

His letter, repeated here with his permission:

“Dear President Cudd:

“I am writing to you today as a former faculty member of PSU, Executive Director of the Oregon Historical Society, a member and leader of several city, state, and federal organizations, and (even) as a former student at BU, UO, and PSU.

“As you might imagine, I am deeply concerned with the possibility that Portland State may demolish Blackstone and Montgomery halls. While it could be a minor challenge to raise the funds necessary for renovating these two historic buildings for student housing, it would even less of a challenge for you to stop this further erosion of our city's historic landscape. Alas, it won't stop with these two buildings. A bad precedent will be set.

“I join many others––including current and former students as well as active community members––in reminding you of the relative simplicity of doing so. Further, you now have on your staff, in Earl Blumenauer, a proven leader in urban affairs who, I believe, will be a strong advocate for such preservation and reuse, as he was while on the City Council and in Congress.

“I could say much more but I won't. You know what is best for PSU's strategic purposes and I can only presume that you will do your best to lead the University in the preservation of so much that makes the South Park Blocks live up to their ideal: a place that helps preserve some of the best of our city.”

So far, according to another concerned person, PSU’s answer has been “crickets.”

Both buildings are interesting historically and architecturally.  Yes, their interiors are badly run down, but redesigning and reconfiguring their interiors likely would be less expensive than demolishing and building something entirely new.

Those of us who care about preservation are often accused of being lost in time and out of step with the modern world.  My answer: When we needlessly destroy attractive assets of the past, we needlessly destroy our own history and a sense that our living generations are a steppingstone between those who came before us and those that will come later. 

Unnecessarily destroying our past means destroying part of the roadway that made us who we are.

 ----Fred Leeson

 Join Building on History’s email list by writing “add me” to faroverpar463@gmail.com


 

1 comment:

  1. Fred. Many of us appreciate your effort in this far too typical potential erasure of our physical history. I remember these and other nearby buildings since my time at both PSU and my subsequent use of the neighboring (as built named) Portland Masonic Temple building.

    ReplyDelete