A six year fight that finally led to the acceptance of the
Eastmoreland Historic District on the National Register of Historic Places is significant
for two reasons.
First, it likely will be the last such district proposed in
Portland for many years to come. Building
a historical record that meets requirements managed by the federal Secretary of
the Interior is a complex and expensive process. The rules fall outside the scope of Portland’s
own zoning rules, which have drawn the ire of local officials and some residents
in the historic neighborhoods.
Second, the process finally defeated fraudulent efforts by a
handful of Eastmoreland residents that tried to create trusts with several
thousand “members” who could vote against the designation. Interestingly, no people were attached to
these trusts; they simply were numbers on pages recorded at the county recorder’s
office. The rules later were amended so
that only real parties who had the ability to sell a property could vote. The later count was 70 percent to 30 percent
in favor of the designation.
Eastmoreland now joins Kings Hill, Ladd’s Addition, the Alphabet
District, Irvington, and Laurelhurst as Portland residential neighborhoods
qualifying for the national recognition.
For the preservation community, the primary benefit of these
designations means that buildings identified as “contributing” elements cannot
be torn down without a public hearing that weighs the reasons for and against
demolition. In essence, it prevents
developers from picking off individual lots to tear down houses and build bigger,
fancier ones.
The Eastmoreland district is composed of 475 acres
containing more than 1,000 buildings that meet the era of being constructed
between 1910 and 1961. The district also
includes the Eastmoreland Golf Course and the scenic Crystal Springs Garden.
The neighborhood’s general plan follows the early 20th
Century City Beautiful planning movement, with a long grassy esplanade along
S.E. Reed College Place and east-west streets following the gentle flow of the
topography rather than being carved into rectangular blocks in an urban
grid.
|
Reed College Place |
As an early Portland suburb, Eastmoreland’s attractiveness
drew several of the city’s most prominent architects. Their designs fell mostly into the popular
historical architectural revival styles of the early to mid-20th Century.
Earlier this year, the Portland City Council revised its
code for historic resources to include new incentives for specific landmarks
and historic districts that could be designated by the City Council, exclusive
of the federal rules. While those rules were
supported by preservationists, there so far has been no interest exhibited by
the City Council or by the city Planning Commission for any new designations.
Cities by their nature, of course, are in continual
flux. There is no way of predicting
eventual success or failure of the city’s own new rules.
----Fred Leeson
Join Building on History’s mailing list by writing “add me”
to fredleeson@hotmail.com
I'm very glad to read this. My architect cousin Ewald T. Pape lived in that neighborhood (his home is listed in the survey) and designed others there that were proposed for the district.
ReplyDelete